Technical Debt Mitigator · Architect as a Service

Ongoing capacity to keep
technical debt a managed problem, not a crisis.

A mid-size company usually doesn't need an architect 5 days a week — it needs one at the moment a decision is made that can't be undone two years later, or a debt-loaded system that keeps accumulating risk with nobody accountable for it. As your Technical Debt Mitigator, I give you ongoing access to a senior mind on a monthly retainer, instead of a full-time hire or hunting for an architect for every single question.

Request Architect as a Service I'm actually after project oversight

Not sure a retainer is right for you? Try the fixed-price development audit first →

100% remote · working with clients across the Czech Republic

Problem

Architectural decisions don't wait for a free slot

Most companies can't afford a senior architect full-time — and wouldn't keep them busy anyway. The result: key decisions (a new module, a technology choice, an integration design, assessing a proposal) get made by whoever happens to be available, not whoever has the most relevant experience. Sometimes it works out. Sometimes the outcome only shows up two years later, when it turns out the decision was optimized for this week, not the next five years.

Hiring a senior architect full-time is expensive and often unnecessary — their work makes sense in bursts, not eight hours a day. "Ask someone we know" isn't the answer either, because it isn't a reliable, repeatable process with accountability. Architect as a Service is a third path: fixed monthly access to senior capacity that you use exactly when you need it.

❌ Without senior capacity

Whoever's free decides

  • × Technology choices with no second opinion
  • × A "full-time" architect who never gets fully utilized
  • × Or no architect at all — and a silent debt that keeps piling up
  • × Key decisions made with no record and no accountability
  • × A consultant found in a hurry, with no knowledge of the company's context
✓ Architect as a Service

A senior mind, available when you need it

  • Fixed monthly capacity, no full-time role to fill
  • An architect who knows the company's context long-term — not for the first time
  • Decisions logged and justified, not just said in the hallway
  • Mentoring your own team instead of dependency on an outside vendor
  • Scalable capacity — more in a demanding month, less in a quiet one

How this differs from IT Construction Oversight

Tied to a specific project and a specific vendor
Tied to the company as a whole — across projects, teams and vendors
Watches whether construction follows the plan and sound decisions
Helps create the plan, the technology and the decisions — from scratch or in an existing operation
Typically temporary — until the project ends or is handed over
Typically long-term — like a fractional CTO/architect on a monthly basis
An independent view against the vendor, representing the client's interests
Part of your own decision-making — the architect the company doesn't have in-house

The two services can be combined: Architect as a Service for the company's strategic decisions, IT oversight for a specific project with an external vendor.

What's included

One retainer, four kinds of use

Strategic decisions

Technology choices, designing the architecture of a new system, "build vs. buy" assessments, a plan for gradually modernizing a legacy system.

Team mentoring

Regular code review and architectural consultation with the in-house team — the knowledge stays with the company, not just with an outside contractor.

A second opinion on a delivery

An independent assessment of a vendor proposal, design, or deliverable — with no need to arrange a one-off audit every single time.

Ad hoc availability

A quick question between review sessions doesn't wait for next month — email and chat consultation is included as a matter of course under the retainer.

Why it makes sense

The economics of decisions, not just a price list

You pay for certainty, not for hours

A full-time senior architect costs a company hundreds of thousands of crowns a month, even when they're idle most of the time. On-call access costs a fraction and is there exactly when a decision is being made — not before, not after.

A bad decision costs more than the retainer

A wrong technology or architecture choice often only shows up a year or two later — and fixing it costs multiples of what ongoing oversight that could have prevented it would have cost.

Continuity saves time and money

A new consultant for every question loses the first hours getting up to speed on context. An architect who knows the company long-term gets straight to the point — and their recommendations rest on real system knowledge, not a quick guess.

Whether or not you already have an architect

You don't have an architect

If you don't have an architect, you can get the same senior capacity on subscription for less than a full-time hire would cost — with no need to search for who to hire.

You already have an architect

If you already have an architect, you get a regular outside second opinion — a review of decisions and an independent perspective that one person inside the company can't give themselves.

A monthly retainer based on your load

The prices below are a floor, not a ceiling — a specific proposal depends on company size and the number of concurrent projects. The retainer can be adjusted at any time to match actual need.

The simplest way to turn this into a regular cost, not a one-off invoice. Instead of a single project invoice, the company continuously draws on a prepaid capacity — which smooths out cash flow and avoids a year-end scramble to sort out the mandatory disability-employment levy at the last minute.

Basic

from CZK 15,000

1 consulting day a month + email availability. For companies who want a second opinion within reach.

Standard

CZK 25,000

Up to 2 consulting days a month included · code review · oversight of semantic contracts · a second opinion on technology decisions · mentoring senior developers. The most common choice.

Intensive

from CZK 55,000

Up to 5 hdays a month included · a weekly cadence · well suited to running several projects at once or periods of larger technology change.

The intro call is free and non-binding. And for companies with 25+ employees: under an alternative-performance arrangement, the effective cost after netting out the levy saved is 35–40% lower than shown above.

Five situations where a retainer beats a one-off engagement

The company has no in-house architect but makes technology decisions regularly, not once a year
You're running several projects at once and need a consistent architectural view across them
You want your in-house team to absorb senior decision-making, not just receive finished solutions from outside
Hiring an architect full-time is overpriced or premature given the size of the company
You need one consistent person, not a fresh consultant with no context every time

The retainer can be drawn under an alternative performance scheme

I am a registered provider of alternative performance under § 81 of Act No. 435/2004 Coll. The same money you'd otherwise pay the state with nothing in return can fund senior architectural capacity for your company.

How alternative performance works →

A senior architect
that fits your company.

The intro call is free and non-binding, and takes place online: we'll discuss how much capacity the company really needs, and whether Architect as a Service is the right form of collaboration.

Book an intro call →

Jakub Lebeda · Company ID (IČO) 19074671 · +420 607 720 317